​

Court Orders Major Remedies Against Google's Search Monopoly

Historic Antitrust Victory Breaks Decade-Long Market Dominance

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has issued sweeping remedies against Google following the Department of Justice's successful monopolization case in United States et al. v. Google. The landmark ruling aims to restore competition in the search and search advertising markets that have remained stagnant for over a decade.

Key Remedies Imposed

Exclusive Contract Prohibitions

Google is now barred from entering or maintaining exclusive distribution agreements for:

• Google Search

• Chrome browser

• Google Assistant

• Gemini AI app

The tech giant cannot create agreements that:

• Tie licensing of Google applications to mandatory distribution of search products

• Link revenue sharing payments to bundled app placement

• Require partners to maintain Google products for more than one year

• Prevent partners from distributing competing search engines, browsers, or AI products

Data Sharing Requirements

The court ordered Google to provide competitors with access to:

• Search index data

• User interaction data

• Search and text ad syndication services

These measures will enable rivals to deliver competitive search results and advertising while developing their own technological capabilities.

Background of the Case

The Monopoly Problem

For years, Google has controlled approximately 90% of all U.S. search queries through what the court found to be anticompetitive practices. The company used its monopoly profits to secure preferential treatment, creating what officials described as a "self-reinforcing cycle of monopolization."

Google's strategy involved locking up primary access points to online search by:

• Requiring preset default status on billions of devices

• Prohibiting competitor preinstallation in many cases

• Using exclusionary agreements across multiple platforms

Legal Timeline

• October 2020: DOJ filed initial lawsuit during first Trump administration

• September 2023: Nine-week bench trial began

• August 2024: Court released 277-page ruling finding Google violated Sherman Act Section 2

• May 2025: 15-day remedies trial concluded

• Today: Final remedies ordered

Government Response

Attorney General Pamela Bondi emphasized the administration's commitment to fighting monopolistic practices: "This decision marks an important step forward in the Department of Justice's ongoing fight to protect American consumers. Under President Trump's leadership, we will continue our legal efforts to hold companies accountable for monopolistic practices."

Assistant Attorney General Abigail Slater of the Antitrust Division noted the case's bipartisan support: "The first Trump administration sued Google to restore competition for millions of Americans subjected to Google's monopoly abuses. Today, the second Trump administration has won a remedy to do just that."

Unprecedented Coalition

The case demonstrated remarkable unity across government levels, with the federal lawsuit ultimately supported by:

• 49 states

• 2 territories

• District of Columbia

• Originally joined by 11 state attorneys general

Future Implications

The remedies extend beyond traditional search to include emerging generative AI technologies, preventing Google from applying similar anticompetitive tactics to new markets. The Justice Department continues reviewing the decision to determine potential additional relief measures.